Mary Rose Cook

When you come to the end, you go back to the beginning

[In this post, there are lots of spoilers for The Wire. If you haven’t seen all five series, go and watch them.]

Lester Freamon in The Wire: “We’re building something here, Detective. We’re building it from scratch. All the pieces matter.”

The writers on The Wire occasionally let their characters say what it is the programme is driving at.

David Simon, the creator, has said that The Wire is about the way institutions affect people’s lives1. He has also said the programme is modeled upon Greek tragedies2, and as he noted, Grecian tragedy is obsessed with fate. If you combine these three insights, you come up with something magical: a piece of art that simultaneously champions two opposing views. In the case of The Wire: that every piece matters, and that the characters are fated.

For the characters, they are fated. Their personalities dictate what they will do when placed in circumstance. For the viewer, every piece matters. They do not have a complete picture of the characters’ personalities. Thus, they cannot predict what the characters will do in each situation until every personality facet has been revealed.

This contradiction is illustrated by Jimmy McNulty’s progression through Series 1. McNulty takes pride in his work and refuses to let police politics or his home life get in the way of his work. This means that when his superiors become concerned that his indictments will start riling their superiors, he continues his investigation. At the end of the series, this leads to him being exiled to a dead-end detail in the Baltimore port.

However, there is an extra subtlety: people can be beholden to zero or more institutions. Can the characters in The Wire choose the institutions to which they belong, and thus have a choice in their fate?

By the end of Series 3, McNulty has had enough of detective work and become a beat officer. This allows him to join the institution of marriage by moving in with Beatie Russell.

Thus, at the end of Series 3, McNulty withdraws from one institution and joins another. Did he choose this, and thus his fate? In a sense. He willfully chose to leave the first institution because it could not meet his terms.

By Series 5, McNulty is a detective again and, consequently, he goes back to drinking and philandering. However, he was most definitely ripped out of his newly adopted institution by the pull of his old one. Thus, in that sense, he had no choice.

1 “[The show is] really about the American city, and about how we live together. It’s about how institutions have an effect on individuals, and how, whether you’re a cop, a longshoreman, a drug dealer, a politician, a judge [or] lawyer, you are ultimately compromised and must contend with whatever institution you’ve committed to.” Source: David Simon “The Target” commentary track [DVD], 2005.

2 “Much of our modern theater seems rooted in the Shakespearean discovery of the modern mind. We’re stealing instead from an earlier, less-traveled construct - the Greeks - lifting our thematic stance wholesale from Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides to create doomed and fated protagonists who confront a rigged game and their own mortality.” Source: David Simon interview in The Believer, 2007.